Erik ten Hag admitted Manchester United “got away with it” after they somehow survived an epic Coventry comeback from 3-0 down to seal victory in the penalty shootout and set up a rematch of last year’s FA Cup final against Manchester City.
United appeared to be cruising towards an easy victory when Bruno Fernandes added to first-half goals from Scott McTominay and Harry Maguire just before the hour mark. But having opted to withdraw the outstanding Kobbie Mainoo from midfield, Ten Hag watched on in horror as Coventry hit back through Ellis Simms and Callum O’Hare before Haji Wright’s added-time penalty took the game to extra time.
Both sides hit the woodwork before the Coventry substitute Victor Torp had what he thought was a late winner ruled out by VAR after Wright was adjudged to have been marginally offside in the buildup. But after Casemiro had missed the first penalty in the shootout, failures from the spot by O’Hare and the Coventry captain, Ben Sheaf, eventually allowed United to prevail.
Having dominated the match until the 70th minute, Ten Hag – whose position as manager is likely to come under increasing scrutiny after allowing another lead to slip – acknowledged that his team had been fortunate to scrape through, with United’s owners Joel Glazer and Sir Jim Ratcliffe watching on from the stands.
“We can’t say this group doesn’t have the right mentality because they showed character today, but in the final part there was a lack of discipline,” said the United manager. “It’s about communication and we have to improve on this.”
Asked why his team have struggled to hold on to leads this season, Ten Hag added: “We can play at a very high level but at the same match we can drop to very low levels. It is not explainable but it’s about taking responsibility. I have to teach my players and we have to do better. On several occasions we have let the results slip away but today we got away with it. I see the mistakes but it’s not an embarrassment – to reach the FA Cup final again is a huge achievement and we will take energy from this.”
The US ex-president appeared uncomfortable at times as his criminal trial finally got under way in New York on Monday
Donald Trump was confronted on Monday with the unsavory details of his alleged attempt to illegally influence the 2016 election by covering up his hush-money payments to the adult film star Stormy Daniels, as the first criminal trial for a former US president got under way in New York.
Trump has pleaded not guilty to 34 counts of falsifying business records – where the hush-money payments were recorded as legal expenses – to cover up the affair just weeks before the election.
Here are the key takeaways from the start of the trial:
The Manhattan district attorney’s office sketched out from the start of their opening statements that Trump committed one crime, the falsification of records, in the furtherance of a second crime, to violate campaign finance laws – which is what would elevate misdemeanor crimes into felonies.
The prosecutor, Matthew Colangelo, presented to the jury that Trump’s “catch-and-kill” scheme with the National Enquirer was entirely geared towards helping the Trump 2016 campaign.
Colangelo contended there were three parts to the alleged conspiracy: that the National Enquirer would run positive coverage, the National Enquirer would attack political opponents and that the National Enquirer would act as the eyes and ears for the campaign to detect and suppress negative stories.
“This case is about a criminal conspiracy and fraud. The defendant, Donald Trump, orchestrated a criminal scheme to corrupt the 2016 presidential election. Then he covered up that conspiracy by lying in his New York business records, over and over and over again,” Colangelo said.
During much of Colangelo’s opening statement, Trump appeared uncomfortable in his seat with his brow furrowed while the unsavory details of the alleged affair with Daniels and his boasts about grabbing women’s genitals in the infamous Access Hollywood tape were read out to the jury.
But part of the Access Hollywood tape that was read out verbatim – when Trump remarked he could grab women “by the pussy” – caused Trump to frown deeper and fidget in his seat. The next six weeks are expected to be a test for Trump to keep his composure.
Todd Blanche, the lead Trump lawyer, tried to present several themes to the jury – but his arguments at times seemed to meld together and were hard to follow.
The point Blanche tried to stress was that Trump had nothing to do with the hush-money payments and how it was all arranged because Trump left it up to his former fixer and lawyer Michael Cohen.
Blanche also suggested Trump did nothing wrong in trying to influence the 2016 election, in part because catch-and-kill schemes are not illegal. “Entering into a non-disclosure agreement is perfectly legal,” Blanche said.
But other parts of his opening statement seemed bizarre. Blanche tried to portray Trump as just a family man – which felt jarring against the affair allegations. And Blanche once added Trump “is a man” like him – oddly, with no follow-up statement.
Blanche also found some of his statements stricken after the judge sustained prosecutors’ objections, including on assertions that Cohen previously lied in court and that Trump did everything on the advice of counsel.
Ipsum volumus pertinax mea ut, eu erat tacimates nam. Tibique copiosae verterem mea no, eam ex melius option, soluta timeam et his. Sit simul gubergren reformidans id, amet minimum nominavi eos ea. Et augue dicta vix. Mea ne utamur referrentur.
Per ex vero nonumy. Ius eu doming nominavi mediocrem, aliquid efficiantur no vim, sanctus admodum mnesarchum ad pro. No sea invidunt partiendo. No postea numquam ocurreret duo, unum abhorreant cu nam, fugit fastidii percipitur nam id.
Sit vivendum eleifend adipiscing ea. Modus legere suscipiantur an vel, melius patrioque est cu, eum at audire probatus repudiandae. Ei tempor definitiones eam, sea dico omnium ne. Eam ad ubique tincidunt elaboraret, malis aperiri sit et. Ut quo vero inimicus. Sed at munere fuisset noluisse, eleifend senserit an vix.
Ei usu malis aeque efficiantur. Mazim dolor denique duo ad, augue ornatus sententiae vel at, duo id sumo vulputate. His legimus assueverit ut, commune maluisset deterruisset id mel. Oblique volumus eos ut, quo autem posidonium definitiones cu. Cu usu lorem consul concludaturque, pro ea fuisset consectetuer. Ex aeterno forensibus has, dicta propriae est ei, ex alterum apeirian quo.
Pri tempor appareat no, eruditi repudiandae vix at. Eos at brute omnesque voluptaria, facer putent intellegam eu pri. Mei debitis ullamcorper eu, at quo idque mundi. Vis in suas porro consequat, nec ad dolor adversarium, ut praesent cotidieque sit. Veniam civibus omittantur duo ut, te his alterum complectitur. Mea omnis oratio impedit ne.
In vim natum soleat nostro, pri in eloquentiam contentiones. Eu sit sapientem reprehendunt, omnis aliquid eu eos. No quot illum veniam est, ne pro iudico saperet mnesarchum. Ea pri nostro disputando contentiones, eu nec menandri qualisque, vis ex equidem invidunt. Et accusam detracto splendide per, congue meliore id sea. Has eu aeterno patrioque expetendis, mel ei dissentiet reformidans.
Usu ad solet diceret, usu at appetere percipit appellantur, te est primis audire gloriatur. Scripta noluisse no mel, vis ne decore ridens labitur. Stet erant saepe eu mea. An mel dolore salutandi abhorreant. An quo aliquip maluisset, mea quaeque indoctum in, pro augue veritus praesent te.
Vim exerci sadipscing in, est simul recteque ei, dictas repudiandae comprehensam cu usu. Te melius veritus tibique pri. Sea nonumy euismod deserunt te. Ad ius nullam malorum assueverit.
Vim et alterum ornatus vivendum, ut mea solum repudiare. His etiam delenit tibique no, ad harum omnes scribentur qui, ne wisi detracto his. Ei movet accusam pri. Ex vel diam quas urbanitas, ne has velit affert habemus. At quis nonumy disputando nec, falli scaevola vel ea. Omittantur concludaturque nam eu, ex est vocent virtute.
